As someone working on the vision and technologies of the post-monetary society, people keep asking me what I think about Bitcoin. Well, you know what? Not much.
Although Bitcoin works in a decentralized, peer-to-peer, open source way, it still remains part of the conventional scarcity paradigm. The fact that it plugs in the conventional scarce money infrastructure ($, €, etc) infuses the scarcity DNA in it. Even worse: it sticks to the “coin”, such an old meme! However I do acknowledge Bitcoin as a step towards the post-monetary society, while remaining inside the mainstream paradigm. It truly questions the bank monopoly for money issuance which paves the way to new possibilities. Advocates and users of Bitcoin will very likely make all possible mistakes that will accelerate the shift.
I like complementary currencies for the service they offer. They help people make the first baby steps out of money as a unique and exclusive way to look at economy. They help people make all necessary mistakes, trials and errors, that may eventually lead them to think “out of the bucks”.
Today different categories of complementary currencies co-exist (some of them can have multiple roles, for instance local and social):
- Local (or regional) currencies: they help a local territory (town, region, etc) to re-monetize themselves and uplift the local economy. Examples: Ithaca Hours (USA), SOL project (France), Chiemgauer (Germany)
- Corporate currencies: they support a specific economic sector. Examples: air miles (travel sector), the WIR (corporate economy in Switzerland), Meal Vouchers (restaurant industry)
- Social currencies: they support social and solidarity economy in the society. Examples: Time Banking (USA), Banco Palmas (Brasil)
- Targeted currencies: they enhance a specific outcome in the economy. Example: carbon currency
I don’t put any work and efforts in complementary currencies. Their name says it all: they complement the system, just like complementary food complements your diet because of its inherent deficiencies. Complementary food and complementary currencies exist because of the mainstream system. On the good news side, we can see complementary currencies as the first steps towards a global interoperable open protocol (see below), just like local networks initiated the transition towards the Internet in the early 90’s.
I just came across a conference given by Fred Wilson, Managing Partner at Union Square Ventures. I like the clear way he shares current trends and how it directs his investments. Fred has a good insight when he says the next currency system has to become an open internet protocol. First time I hear it from someone else than our small circle. Years ago it looked like pure science fiction when I shared this idea, now an investor says it, good news! However Fred Wilson still reduces his forecast to a decentralized monetary system, which means:
- a technology that only addresses movable wealth (commodities, services), and not integral wealth (i.e. movable, measurable, rankable, acknowledgeable, potential — see conferences below).
- a technology that operates only in the conventional market economy, i.e. where we just exchange things, and forget about other possibilities. It discards the rise of gift economies which, in my sense, will prove to become much more powerful and generative than the current market economy limited by immediate conditional reciprocity.
Shifting to the post-monetary society
I think our view on the not-so-far future can go way further. Basically:
- Next post-monetary technologies will work on an open internet protocol (Fred Wilson got this part, which I find very cool and rare) that will allow diversity, multiplicity, interoperability
- Post-monetary technologies will provide a language of integral wealth, not just movable wealth
- Post-monetary technologies will allow large scale gift economies that transcend (and include) market economies
We still have many creative options to name this evolution. Just like the rise of aviation, it will develop its own ontology in our conventional language. I like to use expressions such as “language of wealth”, “integral wealth”, “wealth technologies”.
Also, we don’t have a word to acknowledge the fact we create wealth, in its truest and broadest sense. Hence the creation of the verb to weal: to generate, to give birth to wealth. In the future, we will weal. Weal as wheel (free wheel), weal as will (free will), etc. Will Will wheal? Years ago I booked domain names freeweal (org, com, etc) and weal.me. They wait for their time.
Last but not least, this shift will eventually take us way, way further than what everyone predicts now. The next language of wealth will become a language of flows. We evolve from our current language of finite objects and their relationships towards a language of flows, alive, always changing, quantic (filled with superposed possibilities), holographic (where the I and the We contain each other), super-conscious. There I see the one of the next leaps of our species.
Much more to say about it, hence my long retreat at the present moment (feel free to weal me :-)).
Here come some key conferences about this topic.
Jean-François Noubel – Centifolia convention – Oct. 2013 – Grasse, France
Towards a Systems’ Paradigm and a New Expressive Capacity
Arthur Brock interviewed by Ferananda Ibarra.
After money – TEDx Paris
Activate English subtitles
From a strict formal “systems” approach and given all money systems are Discrete LTI Systems they can be modelled as a sum of “transactions” as described in the following link. Therefore all money systems are subject to BIBO Stability:
Thank you very much for your contribution. The analysis you share behind the link seems to address the “movable” part of wealth via a currency made to address markets. From my experience and perspective, it still remains seg-way between the old paradigm and the one to come (points 1-3). Certainly an important step. Your thoughts?
The purpose of Passive BIBO Currency is twofold, through relevant and well established system science it establishes the lack of rational foundation of the current de facto standard for money i.e. where money is defined as both a commodity as well as a unit of measure, it lays down a rational set of requirements for the stable representation of “value” in a common standard unit.
I agree that this is a step towards a completely new paradigm of all inclusive responsible social governance. The last chapter of my book here: http://bibocurrency.com/index.php/money-psyop-2 and the third step in this article, http://en.wiki.floksociety.org/w/A_Stable_Economic_Value_Representation_for_All_Agents_and_All_Transactions, describe where I believe that step leads to. The key being that a stable money system requires that money be a reference as opposed to centrally controlled resource, leading to distributing control and social governance.
This link is also very relevant. Given that so many people’s lives are being ruined, we need to examine the pretexts with a fine toothed comb:
Interesting read: shifting to a post-monetary society – #sharingeconomy #altcurrency http://t.co/iBt5Bu58Et